Prototype — not a qualification authority. Evidence for human review only.

Turn test data
into evidence.

Investigate anomalies, trace requirements and procedures, and assess qualification readiness.

qi — campaigns/tvac-payload-a
Loading workspace…

Test campaigns generate data.
Qualification requires evidence.

DATAFINDINGSINVESTIGATIONEVIDENCEREADINESS

Qualification Intelligence connects the chain — from raw test artifacts to traceable engineering decisions.

Why Qualification Intelligence

Built for how qualification evidence is actually reviewed.

The problem today

Fragmented test artifacts

A single TVAC or vibration campaign can span CSV exports, TDMS files, procedure revisions, limit matrices, calibration records, and test reports — often reviewed in separate tools with no shared context.

Manual reconciliation

Engineers spend significant time answering basic questions: which limit was violated, under which configuration, against which procedure step, and what evidence supports the finding.

Late evidence gaps

Missing calibration certificates, unlinked requirements, or incomplete traceability often surface only at qualification review — when fixes are most expensive.

What QI does differently
Deterministic

Findings you can explain.

Limit violations, data gaps, and sensor divergence are detected with explicit engineering rules — not opaque models. Every finding has a traceable reason.

Traceable

Anomaly to evidence, in one view.

Connect each finding to the relevant data region, acceptance limit, requirement, procedure step, configuration, and supporting evidence — with gaps surfaced explicitly.

Review-ready

Readiness before sign-off.

See evidence completeness and qualification readiness as an engineering assessment. Human reviewers stay in control — QI makes the reasoning visible, not the decision.

From files to findings. From findings to evidence. From evidence to readiness.

Qualification Intelligence is designed for aerospace and space hardware teams who need test evidence to be explainable, traceable, and reviewable — without replacing engineering judgment.

Workflow
01

INGEST

Campaign data enters the workspace.

02

DETECT

Deterministic checks surface limit violations, gaps, and sensor divergence.

03

INVESTIGATE

Inspect findings against time-series data and procedure context.

04

TRACE

Connect findings to requirements, procedures, and evidence.

05

ASSESS

Evaluate evidence completeness and qualification readiness.

Product

Campaign intelligence workspace.

Campaign

TVAC Payload A

Status

REVIEW REQUIRED

Findings

3

Evidence

82%

Gaps

1

Temperature · acceptance limits
Selected anomaly

Temperature A exceeded upper acceptance limit

Peak 67.2 °C · limit 65 °C

Traceability chain

Finding

Temperature A exceeded upper limit

Data

Samples 94–108 · tvac_telemetry.csv

Requirement

REQ-TVAC-014

Procedure

Step 4 · Cold soak hold

Calibration

Pressure sensor

Evidence

Calibration certificate

Use cases

Built for qualification and acceptance workflows.

Three core workflows where test data, engineering limits, and evidence must be reconciled before a hardware decision is trusted.

Early access

Help define test evidence intelligence.

We are working with aerospace and space hardware teams to understand how qualification and acceptance evidence is created, reviewed, and trusted.

Become a design partner →

Know what happened.
Prove why it matters.

Explore Qualification Intelligence →